Kirjojen hintavertailu – 12 859 819 kirjaa ja 27 kauppaa

Kirjailija

Diana Gehlhaus

Kirjat ja teokset yhdessä paikassa: 5 kirjaa, julkaisuja vuosilta 2017–2024, suosituimpiin kuuluu Structures, Functions, and Processes of Centers of Excellence. Vertaile teosten hintoja ja tarkista saatavuus suomalaisista kirjakaupoista.

5 kirjaa

Kirjojen julkaisuvuodet: 2017–2024.

Strategic Planning and the U.S. Air Force

Strategic Planning and the U.S. Air Force

Michael J Mazarr; Jeffrey Eggers; Diana Gehlhaus; Raphael S Cohen; Caitlin Lee; Rebeca Orrie; Michael Spirtas; Laura Werber; Sean M Zeigler

RAND
2017
nidottu
The U. S. Air Force has embarked on a new round of strategic planning under the auspices of its 2015 Strategic Master Plan (SMP). This report represents a general survey of the state of the art in strategy and planning. We found that basic concept and approach of the SMP has promise, but its emphasis on pre-set planning could obstruct, rather than facilitate, its objectives.
A Clean Sheet Approach to Space Acquisition in Light of the New Space Force

A Clean Sheet Approach to Space Acquisition in Light of the New Space Force

William Shelton; Cynthia R Cook; Charlie Barton; Frank Camm; Kelly Elizabeth Eusebi; Diana Gehlhaus; Moon Kim; Yool Kim; Megan McKernan; Sydne Newberry; Colby P Steiner

RAND
2021
nidottu
The United States newest military service, the U. S. Space Force (USSF), has a unique opportunity to take advantage of the widening range of commercial capabilities and create a new culture and new management processes to respond to the growing challenges presented by potential adversaries in space. The authors describe an unconstrained ?clean sheet? approach to space acquisition for USSF designed around the new service's unique mission.
Research-Portfolio Performance Metrics

Research-Portfolio Performance Metrics

Marjory S Blumenthal; Jirka Taylor; Erin N Leidy; Brent Anderson; Diana Gehlhaus; John Bordeaux; Michael G Shanley

RAND
2019
nidottu
RAND Corporation researchers reviewed metrics for evaluating research portfolios used by medical research organizations and appraised their characteristics and trade-offs associated with their use. This report presents the results, categorized using a logic-model approach, to help organizations responsible for research portfolios to select, develop, and revise the metrics they use in their evaluations.