Martin Demant Frederiksen

Tænkepauser er bogserien, hvor topforskere formidler deres viden om centrale emner som frihed, netværk og tillid. Idéen er at kanalisere forskningen ud til nye målgrupper og ind i hverdagens pauser - fra sofahjørnet til løbeturen. Hver bog er lækkert designet og udstråler den kæmpemæssige begejstring, som forskerne har for deres emne. Kombineret med lettilgængeligt sprog, en overskuelig længde og en ofte humoristisk tone gør det serien til en intet mindre end fremragende formidling af vigtig viden, som ellers ofte kun skrives af fagfolk for fagfolk.

Der er ingenting at være bange for. Tomhed, død og fravær skræmmer os ellers mere end noget andet, men vores frygt er helt og aldeles grundløs. Der vil altid være et eller andet, for hverken noget eller ingenting kan eksistere alene; de er indbyrdes afhængige. Det er nemlig kun ved, at dele af verden træder i baggrunden og forsvinder, at andre dele kan blive til noget. Det ved om nogen Martin Demant Frederiksen, ekspert i nul og niks ved Aarhus Universitet, da han har fyldt en hel Tænkepause med alt det, der ikke findes, men som giver mening til alt det andet.

There have been claims that meaninglessness has become epidemic in the contemporary world. One perceived consequence of this is that people increasingly turn against both society and the political establishment with little concern for the content (or lack of content) that might follow. Most often, encounters with meaninglessness and nothingness are seen as troubling. "Meaning" is generally seen as being a cornerstone of the human condition, as that which we strive towards. This was famously explored by Viktor Frankl in Man’s Search for Meaning in which he showed how even in the direst of situations individuals will often seek to find a purpose in life. But what, then, is at stake when groups of people negate this position? What exactly goes on inside this apparent turn towards nothing, in the engagement with meaninglessness? And what happens if we take the meaningless seriously as an empirical fact?

Georgian Portraits chronicles everyday life in the Republic of Georgia in the decade that followed the Rose Revolution of 2003. Recent anthropological developments argue for the use of "afterlives" as an analytical notion through which to understand processes of socio-political change. Based on a series of portraits, Martin Demant Frederiksen and Katrine Bendtsen Gotfredsen employ the theory of social afterlives to examine the role of revolution in the formation of a modern Georgia. The book contributes to a deeper understanding of life in the aftermath of political reform, depicting the hopefulness of the Georgian population, but also the subsequent return to political disillusionment which lead them to a revolution in the first place.