Philipp Zitzlsperger

The design dilemma is based on the historic separation of design and art since the late Middle Ages. It describes the transformation of design from an art discipline to a problem-solving discipline. On the one hand, this great divergence is accompanied by myths that construct opposites of free art and unfree design, of aura and loss of aura, or of distance and touch. On the other hand, the avant-gardes have often invoked the unity of art and design, which museums or marketing also take up again today. In order to better understand design's wandering between art and non-art, its 600-year history of ideas is now traced for the first time in the fields of art and industrial history as well as the philosophy of pragmatism since about 1900. Special attention is paid to the original ideas and their overformation by technicism, capitalism, functionalism or Darwinism. They create the design dilemma that shapes the "attitude" of its actors.

We live in spaces that we shape in accordance with our own ideas. Our everyday lives leave traces in them that speak to our habits. We grow into the spaces we inhabit-- and they in turn become expressions of our personalities. Conversely, spaces, depending on their architecture and location, inform our existence. Spaces Embodied gathers works of art that, rather than conceiving of the human sphere and the spatial domain as separate, comprehend them in their complex entanglements: in bodily experience, emotional dependency, or the instinctive need for protection. An essay by Olesja Nein, the project's curator, offers an introduction to the exhibition and takes the reader on a tour. Philipp Zitzlsperger, meanwhile, zooms in on the imprint as an artistic technique with a distinctive aura.