Kirjojen hintavertailu – 12 903 724 kirjaa ja 27 kauppaa

Kirjailija

R. Schwarze

Kirjat ja teokset yhdessä paikassa: 3 kirjaa, julkaisuja vuosilta 1989–2010, suosituimpiin kuuluu Mikroelektronik 89. Vertaile teosten hintoja ja tarkista saatavuus suomalaisista kirjakaupoista.

3 kirjaa

Kirjojen julkaisuvuodet: 1989–2010.

Mikroelektronik 89

Mikroelektronik 89

A. Lechner; M. Schrödl; R. Weiß; E. Brenner; P. Seifter; W. Kosta; G. Raimann; F. Furtner; D. Kirchner; H. Bühler; B. Nemsic; W. Jerono; G. Horak; R. Messaros; F. Seifert; P. Fey; A. Goßlau; A. Gottwald; W. Gáspár-Ruppert; P. Kreuzgruber; A. L. Scholtz; W. Smutny; P. Koschnick; W. Schulz; R. Schwarze; Peter W. Fröhling; Robert Casari; E. Fugger; P. Spinadel; J. Niwinski; L. Prager; E. Schauer; G. Rigler; K. Moshammer; H. Arnold; W. Pribyl; R. Röhrer; W. A. Halang; K. Barbier; F. Schiestl; C. Blind; H. Kamper

Springer Verlag GmbH
1989
nidottu
Die Informationstagung "Mikroelektronik" findet im Rahmen der ie (Internationale Fachmesse für industrielle Elektronik) seit dem Jahr 1975 im Abstand von zwei Jahren statt. Die Einzelbeiträge der Tagung 1989 werden in dem vorliegenden Band in übersichtlicher Form präsentiert; sie geben einen guten Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Technik und über Trends auf dem Gebiet der Mikroelektronik. Berichte über konkrete Anwendungen, Methoden und Entwicklungen werden leicht verständlich vorgestellt. Die Autoren kommen aus Industrie und Forschung; dadurch ist gewährleistet, daß sowohl theorie- als auch praxisbezogene Erkenntnisse und Produkte behandelt werden. Der Band umfaßt folgende Themenkreise: Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstellen, Mobilkommunikation, Flexible Automation und Qualitätssicherung, Sensoren und Interfaces.
Law and Economics of International Climate Change Policy
International climate change policy can be broadly divided into two periods: A first period, where a broad consensus was reached to tackle the risk of global warming in a coordinated global effort, and a second period, where this consensus was finally framed into a concrete policy. The first period started at the "Earth Summit" of Rio de Janeiro in 1992, where the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was opened for signature. The UNFCCC was subsequently signed and ratified by 174 countries, making it one of the most accepted international rd treaties ever. The second period was initiated at the 3 Conference of the Parties (COP3) to the UNFCCC in Kyoto in 1997, which produced the Kyoto Protocol (KP). Till now, eighty-four countries have signed the Kyoto Protocol, but only twelve ratified it. A major reason for this slow ratification is that most operational details of the Kyoto Protocol were not decided in Kyoto but deferred to following conferences. This deferral of the details, while probably appropriate to initially reach an agreement, is a major stepping stone for a speedy ratification of the protocol. National policy makers and their constituencies, who would ultimately bear the cost of Kyoto, are generally not prepared to ratify a treaty that could mean anything, from an unsustainable strict regime of international control of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to an "L-regime" ofloopholes, or from a pure market-based international carbon trading to a regime of huge international carbon tax funds.
Law and Economics of International Climate Change Policy
International climate change policy can be broadly divided into two periods: A first period, where a broad consensus was reached to tackle the risk of global warming in a coordinated global effort, and a second period, where this consensus was finally framed into a concrete policy. The first period started at the "Earth Summit" of Rio de Janeiro in 1992, where the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was opened for signature. The UNFCCC was subsequently signed and ratified by 174 countries, making it one of the most accepted international rd treaties ever. The second period was initiated at the 3 Conference of the Parties (COP3) to the UNFCCC in Kyoto in 1997, which produced the Kyoto Protocol (KP). Till now, eighty-four countries have signed the Kyoto Protocol, but only twelve ratified it. A major reason for this slow ratification is that most operational details of the Kyoto Protocol were not decided in Kyoto but deferred to following conferences. This deferral of the details, while probably appropriate to initially reach an agreement, is a major stepping stone for a speedy ratification of the protocol. National policy makers and their constituencies, who would ultimately bear the cost of Kyoto, are generally not prepared to ratify a treaty that could mean anything, from an unsustainable strict regime of international control of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to an "L-regime" ofloopholes, or from a pure market-based international carbon trading to a regime of huge international carbon tax funds.