Tommi Koivula

Kysymys kansainvälisestä asemastamme on aina kiinnostanut suomalaisia. Haluamme tietää, mitä meistä ajatellaan. Millaisia uhkia ja riskejä länsikumppanimme näkevät Suomeen kohdistuvan? Millaisena turvallisuuden osaajana Suomi nähdään? Onko Suomi tärkeä vai toisarvoinen? Kirjassaan Suomi mainittu Tommi Koivula ja Heljä Ossa käsittelevät yleistajuisesti näitä teemoja nykyisessä historiallisessa tilanteessa. Kirja auttaa ymmärtämään paremmin turvallisuuspolitiikkamme dramaattista muutosta viime vuosien aikana ja Suomen Nato-jäsenyyden vaikutuksia.

This book states that burden-sharing is one of the most persisting sources for tension and disagreement within NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation). It also belongs to one of the most studied issues within NATO with distinguishable traditions and schools of thought. However, this pertinent question has been rarely discussed extensively by academics. The key idea of the book is to make burden-sharing more understandable as a historical, contemporary and future phenomenon. The authors take a comprehensive look at what is actually meant with burden-sharing and how it has evolved as a concept and a real-life phenomenon through the 70 years of NATO’s existence.

This book states that burden-sharing is one of the most persisting sources for tension and disagreement within NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation). It also belongs to one of the most studied issues within NATO with distinguishable traditions and schools of thought. However, this pertinent question has been rarely discussed extensively by academics. The key idea of the book is to make burden-sharing more understandable as a historical, contemporary and future phenomenon. The authors take a comprehensive look at what is actually meant with burden-sharing and how it has evolved as a concept and a real-life phenomenon through the 70 years of NATO’s existence.

Koivula examines the discursive space related to the use of military force by the European Union (EU). By examining the EU's relationship to its use of military force during the course of its history and by demonstrating that the contemporary discursive space of the EU military dimension is incoherent in nature and contains inherent contradictions, he seeks to answer the related question of whether extreme forms of military enforcement, for example killing, is appropriate for the EU.

Koivula examines the discursive space related to the use of military force by the European Union (EU). By examining the EU's relationship to its use of military force during the course of its history and by demonstrating that the contemporary discursive space of the EU military dimension is incoherent in nature and contains inherent contradictions, he seeks to answer the related question of whether extreme forms of military enforcement, for example killing, is appropriate for the EU.